The Myth of Justice in America

obama-billboard satire

While watching the live C-Span coverage of Attorney General Eric Holder, testifying in front of the House Judiciary Committee, that despite some very clear and exceptional questions raised, it was also clear that true Justice really is just a myth in America today. Political justice and Justice by the application of Principle of Law no longer meet in harmony of purpose. When Justice is dysfunctional the law is impaired and the social contract is broken. A man has no obligation to obey defective law.  Those who uphold the Law by virtue of the Principle so enshrined, are far wiser than those who merely obey the law like a damn dog on a leash. Slave mentality is taught right along with reading and arithmetic. People say they do not like being told what to do, and yet, they obey law by fiat of authority without a second thought. People do not seem to grasp the truth of sovereignty or the lack of Justice as having the same root.

This is the Sovereign Statement of We the People:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

Only a body of Sovereign men can make such a statement. This was a novel approach to an age old problem. The defect of the Constitution was slavery. The Southern States were an off-shoot of the Norman Class. The people of England have a duality within their culture from being conquered and it is called the British difference. Being an ordinary English citizen was a position of slavery. One every bit as foul as ever  experienced on a southern plantation. There is a mind-set which is well ingrained by such social orders and it was carried right on over to America. A bitter clash was still there brewing its foul qualities between those of the new england and southern cultures. To establish a new form of government meant these men had to put aside their cultural baggage just long enough to actually accomplish the job. Which is why there can be such a staggering contradiction between what the “Declaration” stated and what it meant to those to whom it was soon to be entrusted.

The Constitution was a powerful document of tremendous power and was very specific in its enumerations of Authority— to retain those powers– to place them in a purposeful construct of Principles which can be tested for virtue or foulness. The Offices were attained by Election—- office holders did not have any power THE OFFICE has the power. Think of the office the same a chess piece. The Rook has an enumerated power— to say as Hamilton did that this “office” has an “Implied Power” is to say sometimes the rook has to move like a queen— is of course absurd. No real chess game can change the rules after the game begins– and the constitution cannot be legislated away and no LAW that is Repugnant to the Constitution can be allowed to stand.  To allow repugnant laws to stand means Injustice takes the place of justice.

The corruption of the Office leads to the slew of evils those founding fathers knew all so well. The Constitution was also expertly written to keep private opinion from ever entering into Public law. Thus, the balance of powers was purposely constructed into the Law itself. To undue the balance is to destroy the power itself. A principle long since lost on those now using the “law” like their personal bully stick. That would be political opinion as well. The following are the newest examples of using the ‘law by fiat’ for purposes of injustice, which are politically and constitutionally repugnant.

Questions For Attorney General Eric Holder

Katie Pavlich | May 15, 2013:

“Holder is facing a slew of scandals as he prepares to take questions from lawmakers about Justice Department oversight. First, let’s not forget Holder has been held in contempt of Congress for stonewalling and changing his statements about Operation Fast and Furious. Second, there’s the IRS inappropriately targeting Tea Party groups. Holder said he has opened up a criminal investigation into that case. Third, Holder will be in a room full of reporters while answering questions about the Justice Department secretly monitoring personal and work phone lines of Associated Press reporters. Holder said yesterday he recused himself from the AP leak case “early on” and that the case was handled by Deputy Attorney General James Cole. “

The contention in a nutshell:

“Eric Holder explained yesterday that the motivation to seize Associated Press communications records was based upon “A very-very serious leak. Among the most serious leaks – it put American people at risk.””

“When did the President find out about the Department of Justice’s subpoenas for the Associated Press?”

“MR. CARNEY: Yesterday. Let me just be clear. We don’t have any independent knowledge of that. He found out about the news reports yesterday on the road.”

A serious threat to National Security and the President only finds out after the scandal breaks the news? Even a quick memo on the subject would have demonstrated the contention held by Mr. Holder. If it was so serious why was it such a non-issue?

Another blurb to explain what was behind the actions themselves:

“The decision to subpoena AP phone records was made by Deputy Attorney General James Cole, said a Justice Department official who requested anonymity.

The inquiry into the leak was launched following an AP story last May about a counter-terrorism investigation in Yemen that involved efforts to bomb an aircraft headed for the United States.”Read more:

And finally a report that actually has some meat on the bone:

By Ken Dilanian  May 16, 2013, 3:00 a.m

“WASHINGTON — The unauthorized disclosure of a counter-terrorism operation in Yemen last year compromised an exceedingly rare and valuable espionage achievement: an informant who had earned the trust of hardened terrorists, according to U.S. officials.

His information was said to have led to the U.S. drone strike that killed a senior Al Qaeda leader, Fahd Mohammed Ahmed Quso, on May 6, 2012. U.S. officials say Quso had helped direct the terrorist attack on the Cole, a U.S. Navy guided missile destroyer, in a Yemeni harbor in October 2000. The suicide bombing killed 17 U.S. sailors and nearly sank the warship.

The informant, reportedly a British subject of Saudi birth, also had convinced members of Al Qaeda’s feared Yemeni affiliate that he wanted to blow up a U.S. passenger jet. He was trained and outfitted with the latest version of an underwear bomb designed to pass metal detectors and other airport safeguards, officials say.,0,7043431.story

Wow– he was out-fitted with new and improved bomb underwear! No wonder this informant was so damn important….  So was this like a lingerie party for hard-core, Al Qaeda’s to show off their latest fashionable attire for suicidal missions? Is there a common sense detector any where near a high level U.S. Intelligence office? The ludicrous factor here is so off the scale, so deep into the zone of dismal absurdity that it cannot be anything but bullshit. Are those Yemeni terrorists really that stupid? And what exactly made these “underwear’s” so different from previous models that high yield explosives are no longer detectable by trained dogs? And what the hell kind of fabric is setting off metal detectors? These terrorists are as dumb as dirt, but by golly they know how to manufacture bomb underwear and train other, even more pitiful fools, as in dumb and dumber, to wear them in suicidal attacks?

A few more paragraphs just to put this in perspective:

“Even after the informant left Yemen with the explosive device and turned it over to his handlers, U.S. intelligence officials believed they could use him to help disrupt and destroy the terrorist network operating from Yemen, known as Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, according to three congressional aides briefed on intelligence matters.

They said spy services could make it appear that the underwear bomb had failed and could send their agent back to Yemen to help identify and track Al Qaeda’s top bomb makers and planners.

The Associated Press distributed a wire story on May 7, 2012, that disclosed details of the bombing plot. After that, officials said, the potential for using the informant again was lost.”,0,7043431.story

This underwear leak did not disclose the fool by name. Did the AP story also make a big splash on the Yemeni version of the nightly, terrorist news? Apparently, the leak was so severe that an unconstitutional action was justified. Before I believe one word of this utter BS I want to see a working version of the magical bomb underwear. Until then the rest of the story is just another example of why drone strikes are being sold as legitimate methods of warfare. New toys need targets… and sell them by blowing up suspects, without a trial, or any pretense that a single word as written was backed by anything, but wretched fictions made up by Intel-agents keeping that war-machine profitable.

If they really wanted to sell this ridiculous story they should have out-fitted the AG with a pair and sent him through an airport with the TSA goons giving full body pat-downs plus x-ray screening. If the AG managed not to blow himself up and pass the tests… then it was indeed serious. I doubt the American people will ever see such a real world test of explosive underwear. I wonder if those MythBuster’s guys could figure it all out…?

Moving on to another brewing scandal much more dangerous than silly, explosive underwear:

“The Internal Revenue Service is facing a class action lawsuit alleging that more than 60 million personal medical records were improperly seized by agents from the embattled agency.

According to a story by, an unnamed health-care provider in California is suing the IRS and 15 unnamed agents, alleging that they improperly seized some 60 million medical records of 10 million Americans, including medical records of all California state judges on March 11, 2011.

According to the complaint, the IRS agents had a search warrant for financial data pertaining to a former employee of the “John Doe Company,” however, “it did not authorize any seizure of any health-care or medical record of any persons, least of all third parties completely unrelated to the matter.”

Yet another outrageous example of IRS goons seizing property un-related to the case itself and in doing so violated the Constitution, willingly with no excuses. Apparently they needed some hard-data to run through the models they were tasked to work on in order to implement the grossly mis-named, un-constitutional, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. This thing is a monster dressed like a Sunday school preacher. So long as you ignore the twin heads breathing caustic fire the shoes look authentic. This Act protects a patient like a bullet to the heart protects the liver. Why not call it a noose around the patients neck, held by the IRS until the patient dies from penalties and interest Act?  Or the Patient better buy health insurance right this minute Act.

I read through the monstrosity wondering WHY is every new Act of Congress like a fascists wet-dream? This foul beast is wrapped around the taxpayer so tight a mummy looks bone-bare by comparison. IF you are not a taxpayer this latest affront to common sense has no lawful liability. In fact, a nontaxpayer is not allowed to participate at all period. It is a shame very few will ever realize why they were never the “subjects” of Congress, as 14th amendment citizens. A class reserved for former slaves and artificial persons. A State citizen was already a sovereign by virtue of the Declaration and Congress was NEVER allowed to question or even suggest any other qualification of unalienable Rights. And if somehow those tables were turned the People reserved the Right to throw the rats out of their Offices, despite the rats, collective, socialist dogma. But that would require the People to use their State Houses as originally intended. That would be the power to call forth a Grand Jury to Nullify any defective law which is Repugnant to the Sovereign State Constitutions. Remember that Congress is the servant of the People and as such CANNOT legislate any law in the Union States period! That is the power of Authority as a check on the enumerated powers given in Consent.

And yet another article describing another aspect of the growing IRS scandal:

By David Martosko In Washington PUBLISHED: 18:27 EST, 15 May 2013

Documents: IRS letters harassing conservative groups came from Washington, DC headquarters and from California offices, despite Inspector General’s focus on Cincinnati employees

:Tax agency has admitted targeting tea party groups and other conservative organizations for special, politically motivated scrutiny—

:IRS inspector general focused on wrongdoing in Cincinnati, Ohio office and ignored abusive letters coming from other cities

:MailOnline found letters from IRS’s Washington, D.C. headquarters, and from IRS offices in two southern California cities—

:American Center on Law and Justice is threatening to sue the IRS if 27 tea party groups aren’t granted tax-exempt statuses by Friday.

“Letters from the IRS to tea party-related organizations in Oklahoma City and Albuquerque, New Mexico show that IRS headquarters in Washington, D.C., and two satellite offices in California, were directly involved with sending harassing letters to conservative organizations that sought tax-exempt status.

The IRS has acknowledged only the involvement of its Exempt Organizations office in Cincinnati, Ohio, which typically makes most decisions about granting or denying tax-exempt status to non-profit organizations.

And Wednesday afternoon, CNN cited a congressional source in reporting that the acting IRS Commissioner – whom President Obama fired later in the day – had identified two ‘rogue’ employees, both in Cincinnati, whom he thought were responsible for targeting right-wing organizations with tactics that were not applied to left-wing or non-political groups.”  Read more:

Hmmm… could it be those freedom loving people reading their Constitutions as originally intended know the Law is their defense against tyranny? Is this why the social fascists are hell bent on destroying the credibility of such knowledgeable people by constantly degrading them, insinuating such distortions of character to ridicule and mock them even as they break the Law to use political tactics to undermine unalienable rights?   That seems to be a yes. This is also political warfare on the People. The thugs hiding behind the IRS goons rarely get exposed after un-leashing such nefarious deeds. The mere idea that two “rogues” were simply doing their own thing, with no other reasons or collusions with so interested parties is as silly as the exploding underwear. Even the President was angered by such flagrant violations, which was so surprising, given the fact nothing else violating the Constitutional standards makes him the “scholar” raise a finger of disappointment.  Well, if you discount that middle one aimed at most of the countries non-Marxist constituents.

Nonetheless, he did take action.

Tough day for acting IRS Commissioner Steven Miller, who according to the article blurb below his picture,  is the highest-profile official to resign under pressure from the Obama administration.

Take that you hater of right-wings…..

Miller informed IRS employees in a face-saving email that he would be leaving weeks from now, ‘as my acting assignment ends in early June’ and curiously enough only began his position in Nov 2012. However, another article adds more information about why Mr. Miller was singled out by the President, as an example of his furious anger:

Management Flaws at I.R.S. Cited in Tea Party Scrutiny

By JONATHAN WEISMAN Published: May 14, 2013

“It is clear that the I.R.S. headquarters in Washington was far more involved in the effort than initially portrayed. A “sensitive case report” on Tea Party targeting was sent from Cincinnati to Lois Lerner, the head of the I.R.S.’s division for tax-exempt organizations, and another Washington official on April 19, 2010, more than a year before previously thought. Ms. Lerner told reporters on Friday that she learned of the effort in early 2012 through news media reports of Tea Party complaints.

Even before then, in mid-March 2010, 10 Tea Party cases appear to have been brought to the attention of another senior I.R.S. official in Washington, just two weeks after the Cincinnati effort began, according to the inspector general’s audit.

And Steven Miller, now the acting I.R.S. commissioner, was aware of the matter in March 2012, a month before he told Republican senators there was no special treatment for conservative applicants for tax exemption.

They purposely misled me,” said Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah, the ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee. ”

Putting on my highly skeptical hat– perhaps the anger was just a political case of show-boating to mis-direct the public attentions away from the fact the roots of the scandal begin at the White House. Which is not to say the President himself is the origination. Here is another article on that very point:

Valerie Jarrett “There Will Be Hell to Pay” for Obama’s Critics by Dave Hodges November 18, 2012

“It was shocking when President George W. Bush stated “you are either with us, or you are with the terrorists.” Senior White House Advisor, Valerie Jarrett, has taken these words to a significantly more dramatic level when she stated that “there will be hell to pay” for Obama’s critics in the second term.”

Could there be a connection? Hmmm… hell to pay you right wingers? Or anybody else who dares to criticize the scholar-in-chief?  Another paragraph from this article raises some interesting questions:

“Valerie Jarrett comes from a family which intermarried with the Bill Ayers family. Yes, that would be the Weathermen Underground terrorist leader, Bill Ayers. That would be the same Bill Ayers who told FBI informant, Larry Grathwohl, “that when we take over the United States, and that we will forcibly detain 50 million Americans in re-education camps in which they will probably have to murder 25 million American citizens who cannot be re-educated.

Grathwohl repeated the Ayers statement on the August 18th edition of The Common Sense Show. This is the same Valerie Jarrett family which was also involved with Frank Davis the former head of the Communist Party in the United States. This is the same Frank Davis who Joel Gilbert exposed as Obama’s real father. Additionally, the Jarrett family is also affiliated with other so-called “Red Diaper Babies” in which this young group of intellectual elites called for a communist takeover of the United States in the late 1960′s and early 1970′s.

For those that know their history, you will remember that the same people engage in terrorist acts involving the detonation of explosive devices in which people died, including a San Francisco police officer. Bill Ayers wife, Bernardine Dorne served a prison term for her participation with this group. And we also know, that Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorne, close friends of Jarrett to this day, funded President Obama’s Harvard education. These facts have led many to believe that Valerie Jarrett is making the major decisions in the White House.”

Time will tell soon enough if there is any substance to these allegations. Meanwhile, back at the IRS…. the previous IRS Commissioner, to the soon to be ousted Mr. Miller was embroiled in a different kind of scandal:

And one single bank account was issued 8,393 refunds totaling $236,747, while another account was issued 2,706 refunds totaled $7.3 million in 2011.”

“This report is shocking,” said Rep. Charles W. Boustany Jr., Louisiana Republican and chairman of the House subcommittee that oversees the IRS.

“It’s one thing if the IRS tries to catch fraud and fails, but it’s quite another when management apparently takes steps to weaken program integrity.”

The auditors took a closer look at fraud after being prompted by senators, who said they had heard complaints from IRS employees that their warnings were being ignored. Mr. George confirmed that, saying IRS supervisors were urging employees to turn their backs on potential fraud from identity theft.

Rep. Sam Johnson, Texas Republican, called for IRS Commissioner Douglas H. Shulman to resign.”   Read more:

Another report of yet another dog-leg of the scandal:

IRS official Lerner speedily approved exemption for Obama brother’s ‘charity’    Charles C. Johnson 05/14/2013

“Lerner also appears to have broken with the norms of tax-exemption approval by granting retroactive tax-exempt status to Malik Obama’s organization.

The National Legal and Policy Center filed an official complaint with the IRS in May 2011 asking why the foundation was being allowed to solicit tax-deductible contributions when it had not even applied for an IRS determination. In a New York Post article dated May 8, 2011, an officer of the foundation admitted, “We haven’t been able to find someone with the expertise” to apply for tax-exempt status.

Nevertheless, a month later, the Barack H. Obama Foundation had flown through the grueling application process. Lerner granted the organization a 501(c) determination and even gave it a retroactive tax exemption dating back to December 2008.”  Read more:

Gosh wasn’t that a fine example of getting the job done. Such efficiency is a model for other IRS employees.

Just last month there was this report:

Another IRS Scandal; Employees Lie to Get Welfare, Food Stamps
April 22, 2013 |

“On the heels of “Tax Day,” 24 Internal Revenue Service (IRS) employees have been charged with stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars in government benefits, including food stamps, welfare and housing vouchers.

The story comes out of Tennessee, where federal prosecutors announced this month that the scheme fleeced U.S. taxpayers out of at least a quarter of a million dollars in government benefits. The corrupt IRS employees did it by making false statements to fraudulently obtain the benefits, which also included unemployment insurance.

In short, the IRS workers were “brazenly stealing from law-abiding American taxpayers,” according to the federal prosecutor handling the case. Better yet, Americans are not only paying their salary and generous government benefits while also getting fleeced for the other welfare the corrupt federal workers stole.

This case simply marks the latest of many shameful transgressions for the IRS in the past few years alone.

The agency has repeatedly come under fire for failing to crack down on a number of fraudulent schemes, including prison inmates that illegally receive tens of millions of dollars in tax refunds, federal employees at various agencies that have escaped paying billions in back taxes and letting illegal immigrants get billions in tax refunds.”

Why did Mr. Holden not tackle any of these jaw-dropping cases?  Must be the wrong department for actually upholding Justice.

Fox News InsiderFox News Insider  May 16 2013 // 4:58pm
As seen on Your World with Neil Cavuto— Your World with Neil Cavuto

“There is a new report by the Washington Examiner claiming IRS Director of Exempt Organizations Lois Lerner took home tens of thousands of dollars in bonuses, and she is not alone. Nearly $100 million went toward agency bonuses since 2009 during the period when the IRS was targeting conservative groups, according to the report.

Washington Examiner executive editor Mark Tapscott joined Neil Cavuto to discuss the findings. He said that about 16,000 of the IRS’ 97,000 employees got bonuses that averaged about $5,500 per year.

What were the bonuses based on? Tapscott said, “The civil service bases its performance award system on a number of factors, many of which are very vague, escape definition and generally leave a great deal of discretion to whomever you work for. Trust me, they have very little relationship with the kind of bonuses people get in the private sector for actually producing.” He added, “This is indicative of the culture of pay without performance, which is typical of federal civil service.”

IRS Official in Charge During Tea Party Targeting Now Runs Health Care Office By John Parkinson May 16, 2013 6:15 pm

The Internal Revenue Service official in charge of the tax-exempt organizations at the time when the unit targeted tea party groups now runs the IRS office responsible for the health care legislation.

Sarah Hall Ingram served as commissioner of the office responsible for tax-exempt organizations between 2009 and 2012. But Ingram has since left that part of the IRS and is now the director of the IRS’ Affordable Care Act office, the IRS confirmed to ABC News today.

Her successor, Joseph Grant, is taking the fall for misdeeds at the scandal-plagued unit between 2010 and 2012. During at least part of that time, Grant served as deputy commissioner of the tax-exempt unit.

Grant announced today that he would retire June 3, despite being appointed as commissioner of the tax-exempt office May 8, a week ago.

As the House voted to fully repeal the Affordable Care Act Thursday evening, House Speaker John Boehner expressed “serious concerns” that the IRS is empowered as the law’s chief enforcer.”

Now that is an understatement…. yes protecting patients from health-care is the actual intent of the Law. To make this even easier all patients will be required to hand over all previously private medical information to the IRS, so they can enforce the Act, using your own medical information against you in a Kangaroo Court of Law. And determine your financial liability at the same time. So very cost effective it must be right for all Americans, to have their unalienable rights violated, to protect them from… seriously what is the Patient being protected from? Oh that’s right common sense. I almost forgot as I became overwhelmed by so much scandal and deceit.

Speaking of which:

Why You Can’t Trust the IRS by Daniel J. Pilla

“Unfortunately, IRS snooping into the private affairs of U.S. citizens is not new. Twenty years ago Sen. Frank Church of Idaho chaired a Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities. The focus of the 1975 committee report was the illegal intelligence activities of the IRS. The committee hearings revealed, among other things, that the IRS routinely engaged in undercover surveillance of public meetings, such as sporting events and the like; regularly used undercover operatives to supply IRS contacts with statements made by citizens under investigation; and would take license plate numbers of the most expensive-looking automobiles present at public gatherings to develop lists of people to audit.

Some of the more bizarre revelations included the fact that the Federal Bureau of Investigation and even the Central Intelligence Agency regularly asked for and were given the tax returns of any person or organization they wished.

The hearings revealed that the IRS had developed “hit lists” of some 8,000 people and 3,000 organizations that would be targeted for audit, though they were not suspected of owing taxes.

It was revealed that the IRS had created a specialized–and highly secret–staff whose job was to conduct surveillance and intelligence-gathering activities against various political groups for political reasons, not for reasons of tax law enforcement. The title given that group by the IRS was the Special Service Staff, or SSS.

At the conclusion of the hearings, Senator Church made this statement to then IRS commissioner Donald C. Alexander regarding IRS treatment of confidential tax return information:

“This committee is concerned about what is becoming obvious in the course of these hearings, and this is the spreading of “Big Brother” government methods, and what your testimony shows is that, at least as of now, every taxpayer in this country is on notice that when his tax return is filed in the IRS, it means any agency of Government that can claim an official interest can get into that tax return for its own purposes. What better form is there to intimidate people, harass people, force them to comply with whatever it is some other agency may have in mind, than to have his tax return and information it may contain.”[58]

Throughout his testimony, Commissioner Alexander assured the concerned senators that the IRS would fix the problem. The SSS, for example, was dismantled under Alexander. He assured former senator Walter Mondale that he was very much in favor of the idea that confidentiality laws “should be tightened up.”[59]

The promises former commissioner Alexander made 20 years ago closely resemble those of current commissioner Margaret Richardson. In her testimony to a Senate committee on August 4, 1993, she gave the following assurance to Congress regarding the security of confidential taxpayer information: “As a result of our internal reviews, we have taken steps to put greater management emphasis to ensure the safeguards of the privacy and security of taxpayer information.”[60]

While her assurances about taxpayer privacy are certainly impressive, the facts indicate something entirely different. On December 20, 1994, fewer than 18 months after her glowing statement to Congress regarding taxpayer privacy, the IRS, under Commissioner Richardson, announced a plan to install a system that would link its computers with every public and private database in the nation. The purpose of the system is to provide the IRS with “on-line access” to data, including commercial sources, state and local agencies, construction contract information, license information from state and local agencies, Currency and Banking Reports (CBRS), data regarding assets and financial transactions from state and local agencies, and information on significant financial transactions from reviews of periodicals and newspapers and other media sources.[61]

The notice goes on to describe exactly who would be the target of the proposed IRS invasion of every database in the nation. The proposal identifies the people covered under the aggressive electronic surveillance system as any individual who has business and/or financial activities. These may be grouped by industry, occupation, or financial transactions included in commercial databases, or in information provided by state and local licensing agencies.[62]

The IRS’s information-gathering plans could not be broader. Very simply, the agency intends to use electronic methods to spy on the daily activities of every individual in the nation. Under the guise of tax law enforcement, the IRS plans to create an electronic dossier on every citizen. Under the best of circumstances, that is a chilling proposition. Given the IRS’s record on truthfulness, accuracy, and reliability in its activities, the idea of its conducting electronic surveillance of every citizen is exceedingly dangerous.

A previous IRS Commissioner who was also  just following standard political policy in regards to wielding IRS money making influence [His tax returns must have been something quite special] :

On the Take: IRS Chief Rossotti Gets Kickbacks from Corporate-Government Fraud  by Uri Dowbenko

Rossotti’s IRS Shakedowns: Political Enemies Audited

“The long-standing tradition of failing upward has finally landed Rossotti in the office of Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service.

According to his website bio, ( Charles Rossotti “assumed his duties as Commissioner on November 13, 1997, pledging to turn the IRS into an organization that will consistently provide first-class service to the American public.”

This stance belies the ugly reality of the IRS and its ongoing shakedowns of perceived political enemies. Its well-known tactics of fear and intimidation have been increasing steadily, marking the IRS as a reasonable facsimile of Soviet thuggery and/or banana republic corruption.

Since Rossotti assumed office, many political enemies of the administration have suffered IRS audits. These audits can only be construed as politically motivated de facto harassment.

A partial list of those targeted by Rossotti and his allegedly “kinder gentler” IRS include:

· Joseph Farah and The Western Journalism Center

· Juanita Broaddrick, who publicly accused Clinton of raping her while he was Arkansas attorney general

· National Center for Public Policy, a group critical of Clinton’s environmental policies

· Bill O’Reilly of Fox News’ The O’Reilly Factor

· Citizens Against Government Waste.

· Catherine Austin Fitts, former FHA Commissioner under Jack Kemp and President of Hamilton Securities, a company which ironically saved HUD $2.2 billion through its innovative loan sales/auction.”

And this is just a quick skim off the top of the ice-berg. And all of this fascist oligarchy, plutocratical mind-numbing rat-fest is attached to the taxpayer like a bloated parasite. A word which is empty of meaning, unless used against you in a Court of Law.

“The Congress shall have Power to Lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excise, to Pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;” The Constitution for the United States of America, Article 1, Section 8, paragraph 1.

” No Capitation or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration hereinbefore directed to be taken.” The Constitution for the United States of America, Article 1, Section 9, paragraph 4.

Were those Founding Fathers such imbeciles that they would Declare themselves Sovereign People, as in no longer under the tyranny of a despotic ruler, only to create a form of Republican government which would then place them right back under the tax whip? Note the specific clarity in which the powers are listed… the property of a mans Labor was not one of those items. The Capitation tax is one of the most mis-understood of direct taxes due to the fact it was on the States— NOT the People themselves. Or there would be no need for a Census, to apportion the Direct tax fairly by such population counts. The number of representatives was directly tied to the Census to keep States from under and over reporting their populations, as to gain representation, also meant to increase the tax proportions. This was a balance between the States, who in turn collected the tax from their populations. The direct tax was never intended to be anything but an emergency source of revenue for war debts. In fact, it was rarely used at all.

That is until war became the source for debt generated income. Another reason why war never ends in America. War also justifies the Acts which in turn strip away the 14th amendment rights of slaves and artificial persons. Which is why the federal government has promoted the idea that only 14th amendment  “citizenship” is what modern Americans need concern themselves with legally, and that other form,which is superior,  is just some old quaint notion, hardly worth a second glance. Hell, they would outlaw that as well, if it didn’t give away the whole scheme. After all, if the inferior citizen ever learned why such a superior class existed, they might well question how did those people back then ever call themselves free?

If only black people were slaves why did any one else need such an amendment at all? How did all those other people living in non-slave States, determine their National status? Why it is absurd to suggest they were slaves too… and needed yet another amendment to make them free. So that amendment was only necessary for slaves, to place them— UNDER the authority of the U.S. Federal zone operating out of the District of Columbia. A protection racket was born.

If free men already had unalienable Rights— what inferior Rights needed such additional protections? The absurdity of claiming the new rights were superior to the old is so odious it begs the question of why have Sovereign State Constitutions at all? They called them Union States for a reason— the United States— all sovereign nations in their own rights… together as one secured the People from threats exterior to the Country. Congress is an International body to deal with external matters of State. The powers given by Consent,  are centered on the need to  participate on the world stage and conduct the nations interests accordingly.  Congress, never had the People as its subjects. To claim otherwise is a provable fallacy.

Justice and war are like oil and water. They do not mix. The longer this Nation heads down the road of no Justice at all— the more deeply ingrained the corruptions become, the true essence of that warning found in the Declaration becomes all the more prophetic:

“Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. ”

How much abuse does it take to change a Nations conscience? Does Congress still possess a conscience?

According to that debt clock

The estimated population of the United States is 314,973,385
so each citizen’s share of this debt is $53,283.22 OR 148,102 DOLLARS PER TAXPAYER.

The IRS would be in a state of shock if the American people were no longer under the false income tax whip. And the lender scam would cease a second later. Artificial debt is about as real as mickey mouse money. A synthetic dollar is an insult to hard-working Americans, and the root of all injustice today. Thus, debt money destroys the sovereign freedom. The President never had the authority to remove the property of the American people much less make owning gold or silver Coin money against the Law. The standard of the Law was in the weights and measures of the Substance– a distinction lost in the fog of injustice. The IRS is actually tasked with removing the debt dollars out-of-circulation to perpetuate the illusion inflation is under control. As if the diminishment of the purchasing power of the debt dollar was a measure of its success. Now there is a bite of injustice which leaves a mark on us all.


Tags: , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: